Evaluation of pain, disease activity, anxiety, depression, and neuropathic pain levels after COVID-19 infection in fibromyalgia patients.

BACKGROUND: Psychological stressors may cause mental disorders such as anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorders and fibromyalgia (FM) patients could be affected by these stressors. AIM: To evaluate pain, disease activity, anxiety, depression, and neuropathic pain levels after COVID-19 infection in patients with FM. METHODS: According to the 2016 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, fifty-seven patients with FM alone and 77 patients with FM and recovering from COVID-19 infection were recruited to the study (group 1: patients with FM alone and group 2: patients with FM and recovering from COVID-19). Demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded. The pain level was determined by the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), the pain regions by the Widespread Pain Index (WPI) of the 2016 ACR criteria, the severity of the symptoms by the Symptom Severity Scale (SSS) of the 2016 ACR criteria, the disease activity by the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), the anxiety and depression levels by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the neuropathic pain level by Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs Pain Scale (LANSS). RESULTS: Age, height, weight, Body Mass Index (BMI), and the duration of FM diagnosis were similar in both groups (p > 0.05). NRS, FIQ, HADS depression scale, and SSS and LANSS scores were similar between group 1 and group 2 (p > 0.05). HADS anxiety score and WPI were significantly increased in group 2 (p = 0.026 and p = 0.024 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Anxiety and widespread pain levels were higher in patients with FM and recovering from COVID-19 infection.

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis Refractory to Biologic Therapies: 2-Year Results from the Phase 3 Select-Psa 2 Study

Background/Aims Upadacitinib (UPA), an oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients (pts) with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and prior inadequate response or intolerance to >=1 biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) at week (wk) 56 in the phase 3 SELECT-PsA 2 study. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of UPA at wk 104 from the ongoing long-term extension of SELECTPsA 2. Methods Pts were randomized to UPA 15mg (UPA15), UPA 30mg (UPA30), or placebo (PBO) for 24 wks;PBO pts were then switched to UPA15 or UPA30. For continuous UPA treatment groups, efficacy endpoints at wk 104 were analyzed using non-responder imputation (NRI) and as observed (AO) (binary endpoints) or mixed-effect model repeated measures (MMRM) and AO (continuous endpoints). Treatmentemergent adverse events (TEAEs) were summarized for pts who received >=1 dose of study drug using visit-based cut-off at wk 104. Results A total of 641 pts received >=1 dose of study drug. At wk 104, 38.4% of all patients had discontinued study drug, with the highest discontinuation observed in patients randomized to PBO at baseline (all PBO: 46.7%). The most common reasons for discontinuation were lack of efficacy (UPA15: 12.3%, UPA30: 8.7%, all PBO: 21.7%) and adverse event (UPA15: 10.9%, UPA30: 13.3%, all PBO: 12.7%). The proportion of UPA pts that achieved ACR20/50/70, MDA, PASI75/90/100, and resolution of dactylitis and enthesitis were generally similar, or further improved, with 104 wks of treatment vs 56 wks. Similarly, mean change from baseline in HAQ-DI, patient's assessment of pain, BASDAI, and ASDAS was improved with UPA treatment. At 104 wks of therapy, clinical responses were largely similar with UPA15 and UPA30. Generally, safety data at wk 104 were consistent with that reported at wk 56. Rates of serious infection, herpes zoster, hepatic disorder, anemia, neutropenia, lymphopenia, and CPK elevation remained numerically higher with UPA30 vs UPA15, while rates of malignancies, MACE, and VTE were similar for both UPA groups. One death was reported with UPA15 (unexplained due to lack of information;however, the patient had recently been diagnosed with ovarian cancer) and two with UPA30 (pancytopenia and COVID-19 pneumonia). Conclusion In PsA pts with prior inadequate response or intolerance to>=1 bDMARD, clinical responses were maintained with UPA15 and UPA30 up to two years of treatment. No new safety signals were identified in this long-term extension.

Comparing Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity during the Covid-19 Pandemic Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures with Face-Toface Clinical Evaluation of Disease Scores Prepandemic

Background/Aims During the COVID-19 pandemic, asynchronous consultations were introduced for patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). To assess disease activity in the absence of face-to-face clinical review and blood testing, patients submitted patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) via electronic survey forms which were subsequently triaged by clinicians. We compared pre-pandemic clinician-reported scores with intra-pandemic self-reported scores and assessed clinical outcomes including allocation of follow-up and further management/ treatment escalation. Methods Clinician-reported scores were obtained in-person pre-pandemic (defined as 01/01/2019-01/03/2020). Self-reported BASDAI scores were submitted by patients via electronic forms sent out duringpandemic (defined as 01/12/2020-31/03/22). The responses were stored and analysed in a secure database. These scores are analogous to disease activity scores completed by clinicians during outpatient appointments. Score comparison was performed using Wilcoxon Sign Rank testing. We used the need for a follow-up within 3 months as target for those with severe disease. Data analysis was performed in Microsoft Excel and R (version 4.2.1). Results We noted a significantly higher overall level of patient-reported disease activity during the pandemic. In the total cohort of AS patients, the median BASDAI Score collected during-pandemic increased from 5.30 (n=124, range 0-10) compared to 2.80 pre-pandemic (n=590, range 0-12) (p<0.001). The proportion of patients with severe/active disease (defined as BASDAI >4) increased from 36% pre- to 65% during pandemic. In a smaller cohort of 34 patients for whom we had both pre- and during-pandemic scores, all patient parameters worsened during the pandemic. Notably, median BASDAI increased from 2.65 to 5.62 (p<0.0001). Patients with severe AS increased from 10 (29.4%) to 21 (61.8%) intra-pandemic. Follow-up data was available for 12/21 patients with severe AS during-pandemic. 7/12 patients (58%) received a follow-up appointment within one month;11/12 (91%) were seen within three months. On subsequent clinician assessment, only 7 (58%) of patients with self-reported severe AS were felt to have active disease;treatment was escalated for 3 patients. Conclusion There was a significantly higher reported level of AS disease activity during the COVID-19 pandemic, with 62 % of patients qualifying for biologic therapy (BASDAI >4). In a focussed sample, 91% of patients with new severe disease during-pandemic were followed up within the target of 3 months. The BASDAI score is independent from clinical examination and inflammatory markers, and therefore self-reported score should reliably reflect a patient's perception of disease activity. Further work is required to determine the reason for the increased disease activity observed during pandemic, and for the disparity between clinician impression and score results.

Assessment of Disease Activity in Adolescent Patients with Chronic Inflammatory Diseases after Vaccination against Covid-19ata University Hospital in Manaus

Objectives: Chronic Inflammatory Immune-mediated Diseases (CIMD) can cause pain and severe discomfort to the patient, leading to significant reductions in his/her quality of life. Vaccination against COVID-19 has proven to be an efficient method in preventing cases and serious repercussions. However, there is insufficient evidence on the safety of these vaccines in the CIMD population. Objective(s): To assess disease activity in adolescent patients with CIMD after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. Method(s): Observational, longitudinal, ambidirectional study with follow-up of groups of adolescent patients with CIMDwho received the vaccine provided by the National Immunization Program -Pfizer/BioNTech. Sociodemographic and clinical disease activity data were collected before and after each vaccine dose. Data were stored through an online platform (REDCap). This study is associated to the SAFER Project from the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology and was approved by the local Research Ethics Committee. Result(s): Nineteen adolescents aged between 12 and 17 years were included, all of whom met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Of the total, 31.6% have Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA)-14.33 +/- 2.25 years of age, whose subtypes included persistent oligoarticular JIA (16.7%), Polyarticular Rheumatoid Factor (RF) negative (33.3%), Polyarticular RF positive (16.7%) and Systemic (33.3%);68.4% have Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) -14.77 +/- 1.96 years of age. Regarding JIA patients, at inclusion, the mean disease activity assessed by the physician was 3 +/- 3.83 and 3.25 +/- 3.77 as assessed by the patient. After the 1st dose, the mean activity assessed by the physician was 2.8 +/- 3.9 and after the 2nd dose it was 3 +/- 4.24. Themean activity after the first dose as assessed by the patient was 3.2 +/- 3.96, and after the 2nd dose it was 2.8 +/- 3.11. In the SLE patients, at inclusion, the mean degree of disease activity was 1.92 +/- 1.83 and of the SLEDAI-2 K was 4.67 +/- 5.14. After the 1st dose, the mean disease activity was 1.11 +/- 1.96, and after the 2nd dose, it was 2.25 +/- 2.76. After the 1st dose, the SLEDAI-2 K was 1.11 +/- 1.76, and after the 2nd dose it was 4.25 +/- 5.28. No reports of worsening of disease activity after the vaccine were found. Conclusion(s): The vaccination proved not to contribute to worsening of clinical activity of rheumatic diseases in adolescents, without significant changes in SLE assessment indices and in the personal and medical assessment of JIA patients.

Safety and Immunogenicity of Coronavac and Chadox1 Vaccines against Sars-Cov-2 in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Brazilian Multicentric Study

Objectives: To evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of CoronaVac and ChAdOx1 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). Method(s): These data are from the 'SAFER (Safety and Efficacy on COVID-19 Vaccine in Rheumatic Diseases)' study, a Brazilian multicentric longitudinal phase IV study to evaluate COVID-19 vaccine in immunomediated rheumatic diseases (IMRDs). Adverse events (AEs) in patients with RA were assessed after two doses of ChAdOx1 or CoronaVac. Stratification of postvaccination AEs was performed using a diary, filled out daily. The titers of neutralizing antibodies against the receptor-biding domain of SARS-CoV-2 (anti-RBD) were measured by chemilumine scence test after each dose of immunizers. Proportions between groups were compared using the Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables. Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) before and after vaccination was assessed using the McNemar test. Result(s): A total of 188 patients with RA were included in the study, most of them were female. CoronaVac was used in 109 patients and ChAdOx1 in 79. Only mild AEs were observed. The more common AEs after the first dose were pain at injection site (46,7%), headache (39,4%), arthralgia (39,4%) and myalgia (30,5%), and ChAdOx1 had a higher frequency of pain at the injection site (66% vs 32 %, p alpha 0.001) arthralgia (62% vs 22%, p alpha 0.001) and myalgia (45% vs 20%, p alpha 0.001) compared to CoronaVac. The more common AEs after the second dose were pain at the injection site (37%), arthralgia (31%), myalgia (23%) and headache (21%). Arthralgia (41,42 % vs 25 %, p = 0.02) and pain at injection site (51,43% vs 27%, p = 0.001) were more common with ChAdOx1. No patients had a flare after vaccination. The titers of anti-RBDafter two doses of ChAdOx1 were higher compared to two doses of CoronaVac (6,03 BAU/mL vs 4,67 BAU/mL, p alpha 0,001). Conclusion(s): The frequency of local adverse effects, particularly pain at injection site, was high. AEs were more frequent with ChAdOx1, especially after the first dose. The use of the immunizers dis not change the degree of inflammatory activity of the disease. In patients with RA, ChAdOx1 was more immunogenic than CoronaVac. .

Primary SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: long-term humoral immune responses and effects on disease activity.

BACKGROUND: Patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) on immunosuppressants (ISPs) may have impaired long-term humoral immune responses and increased disease activity after SARS-CoV-2 infection. We aimed to investigate long-term humoral immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 and increased disease activity after a primary SARS-CoV-2 infection in unvaccinated IMID patients on ISPs. METHODS: IMID patients on active treatment with ISPs and controls (i.e. IMID patients not on ISP and healthy controls) with a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection before first vaccination were included from an ongoing prospective cohort study (T2B! study). Clinical data on infections and increased disease activity were registered using electronic surveys and health records. A serum sample was collected before first vaccination to measure SARS-CoV-2 anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) antibodies. RESULTS: In total, 193 IMID patients on ISP and 113 controls were included. Serum samples from 185 participants were available, with a median time of 173 days between infection and sample collection. The rate of seropositive IMID patients on ISPs was 78% compared to 100% in controls (p < 0.001). Seropositivity rates were lowest in patients on anti-CD20 (40.0%) and anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents (60.5%), as compared to other ISPs (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Increased disease activity after infection was reported by 68 of 260 patients (26.2%; 95% CI 21.2-31.8%), leading to ISP intensification in 6 out of these 68 patients (8.8%). CONCLUSION: IMID patients using ISPs showed reduced long-term humoral immune responses after primary SARS-CoV-2 infection, which was mainly attributed to treatment with anti-CD20 and anti-TNF agents. Increased disease activity after SARS-CoV-2 infection was reported commonly, but was mostly mild. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NL74974.018.20, Trial ID: NL8900. Registered on 9 September 2020.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with rheumatoid arthritis: data from the Ontario Best Practices Research Initiative (OBRI).

Objective: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic created challenges for patients with RA. We examined the potential impact of the pandemic on patient-reported outcomes (PROs), disease activity and medication profiles, comparing the periods pre-pandemic and during the pandemic. Methods: Patients enrolled in the Ontario Best Practices Research Initiative were included if they had at least one visit to a physician or study interviewer within 12 months before and after the start of pandemic-related closures in Ontario (15 March 2020). Baseline characteristics, disease activity, PROs [i.e. health assessment questionnaire disability index, RA disease activity index (RADAI), European quality of life five-dimension questionnaire], medication use and changes were included. Student's paired two-sample t-tests and McNamar's tests were performed for continuous and categorical variables between time periods. Results: The sample for analysis consisted of 1508 patients, with a mean (s.d.) age of 62.7 (12.5) years, and 79% were female. Despite decreases in the number of in-person visits during the pandemic, there was no significant negative impact on disease activity or PRO scores. The DASs in both periods remained low, with either no clinically significant differences or slight improvement. Scores for mental, social and physical health were either stable or improved. There were statistically significant decreases in conventional synthetic DMARD use (P < 0.0001) and increased Janus kinase inhibitor usage (P = 0.0002). Biologic DMARD use remained stable throughout the pandemic. Conclusion: In this cohort, disease activity and PROs of RA patients remained stable during the COVID-19 pandemic. The longer-term outcomes of the pandemic warrant investigation.

Low serum level of citrullinated histone H3 in patients with dermatomyositis.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed at analyzing the serum levels of citrullinated histone H3 (CitH3) in patients with dermatomyositis (DM) and their association with disease activity. METHODS: Serum CitH3 levels were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays in serum samples obtained from 93 DM patients and 56 healthy controls (HCs). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the discriminant capacity of CitH3 and other disease variables. The association between CitH3 and disease variables was analyzed using Pearson's rank correlation. RESULTS: Serum CitH3 level was significantly lower in DM patients than in HCs (p < 0.001). The ROC curve analysis revealed that CitH3 strongly discriminated DM patients from HCs (area under the curve [AUC], 0.86), and a combination of CitH3 and the ratio of neutrophil to lymphocyte counts (NLR) showed a greater diagnostic value (AUC, 0.92). Serum CitH3 levels were markedly lower in DM patients with normal muscle enzyme levels than in HCs (all p < 0.001), and when compared to an elevated group, the CitH3 levels were comparable (all p > 0.05). The CitH3 levels showed no difference between DM in active and remission groups. However, in a paired test with 18 hospitalized DM patients, the CitH3 levels were higher in remission state than in active state. Moreover, the CitH3 levels showed no correlation with disease variables that were associated with the disease activity of DM. CONCLUSIONS: Serum CitH3 level may serve as a useful biochemical marker for screening patients with DM from HCs, while its role in monitoring DM disease activity requires further research.

Telecommunication in the COVID-19 era: As an assessment tool for patients with dermatomyositis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the archetypal inflammatory arthritis, remains a complex and challenging disease to manage in spite of the abundance of new therapies in the last 20 years. The unpredictable relapsing/remitting nature of RA is at odds with the current prevailing system of scheduled follow-ups, leaving patients with RA to manage pain, flares, and medications between appointments, which may be of little value if occurring during a period of disease control. The rapid progress in the field of mobile health (mHealth) in the last 10 years has led to a proliferation of smartphone applications (apps) targeted at people with RA. Harnessing the power of smartphones to deliver remote monitoring for patients with RA has gone from an exciting possibility to an urgent necessity due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Apps developed solely by commercial providers have been found to be of limited utility in disease monitoring. However, multiple global institutions have developed mHealth technology to support remote monitoring of RA patients, utilizing asynchronous technology for patients to submit indicators of their disease activity, ranging from validated electronic patient-reported outcome measures, to innovative monitoring utilizing smartphone biosensors. This review discusses the current published evidence for mobile applications designed to facilitate remote monitoring of RA, the common barriers faced in implementing mhealth monitoring and strategies to overcome these, and potential areas for future research.

Predictors of COVID-19 severity and outcomes in Indian patients with rheumatic diseases: a prospective cohort study.

Objective: There is dearth of data regarding the outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) among rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease (RMD) patients from Southeast Asia. We report the clinicodemographic profile and identify predictors of COVID-19 outcomes in a large cohort of Indian RMD patients. Methods: This prospective cohort study, carried out at the Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh (a tertiary care centre in India), included RMD patients affected with COVID-19 between April 2020 and October 2021. Demographic and clinical and laboratory details of COVID-19 and underlying RMD were noted. Predictors of mortality, hospitalization and severe COVID-19 were identified using stepwise multivariable logistic regression. Results: A total of 64 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2-infected RMD patients [age 41.5 (19-85) years; 46 (72%) females] were included. Eighteen (28%) patients had severe COVID-19. Twenty-three (36%) required respiratory support [11 (17%) required mechanical ventilation]. Thirty-six (56%) patients required hospitalization [median duration of stay 10 (1-42) days]; 17 (27%) required intensive care unit admission. Presence of co-morbidities [odds ratio (OR) = 4.5 (95% CI: 1.4, 14.7)] was found to be an independent predictor of COVID-19 severity. Co-morbidities [OR = 10.7 (95% CI: 2.5, 45.4)] and underlying lupus [OR = 7.0 (95% CI: 1.2, 40.8)] were independently associated with COVID-19 hospitalization. Ongoing rheumatic disease activity [OR = 6.8 (95% CI: 1.3, 35.4)] and underlying diagnosis of lupus [OR = 7.1 (95% CI: 1.2, 42.4)] and SSc [OR = 9.5 (95% CI: 1.5, 61.8)] were found to be strong independent predictors of mortality. Age, sex, underlying RMD-associated interstitial lung disease and choice of immunosuppressive therapy were not associated with COVID-19 severity or adverse outcomes. Conclusion: The presence of co-morbidities was independently associated with COVID-19 severity and hospitalization. Ongoing rheumatic disease activity and the presence of lupus or SSc independently predicted mortality. Age, sex, type of immunosuppressive therapy and presence of RMD-associated interstitial lung disease did not affect COVID-19 severity or outcomes in Indian RMD patients.

Changes in Juvenile Dermatomyositis after the Covid-19 Pandemic

Background. Prior research has shown that viruses may trigger JDM, although the degree to which COVID-19 may serve as a trigger for JDM remains unknown. We present two case reports of JDM occurring after COVID-19 infection. We also provide case numbers of new JDM diagnoses pre-and post-COVID-19 as well as an analysis of JDM population characteristics pre-and post-COVID-19. A 5year-old female developed upper respiratory infection (URI) symptoms and was diagnosed with COVID-19 in December of 2020. She developed Gottron's sign, heliotrope rash, and weakness resulting in admission in February of 2021. She had elevated CK, AST, ALT, LDH, and aldolase. Her CMAS (childhood myositis assessment scale) was 24. An MRI showed diffuse myositis. Myositis specific antibody (MSA) testing revealed a positive MJ antibody. She was diagnosed with JDM and started on steroids, methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine, and IVIG with improvement. The second patient was a 4year-old female who was diagnosed with COVID-19 in October 2020. In January 2021, she developed heliotrope rash and Gottron's papules. She developed decreased exercise tolerance in May 2021 found to have elevated Aldolase and LDH. Her CMAS was 34. An MRI showed diffuse myositis. MSA testing was significant for a positive P155/140 antibody. She was started on hydroxychloroquine, steroids, IVIG and methotrexate with improvement. Due to the aforementioned cases a retrospective analysis was performed assessing the characteristics of JDM pre-and post-COVID-19 at Lurie Children's Hospital. Methods. The Cure JM biorepository houses clinical data, laboratory data, and patient samples obtained at the onset of JDM. The following information was obtained from newly diagnosed JDM patients: MSA, DAS (disease activity score), flow cytometry results, vWF antigen, neopterin, CMAS, capillary end row loop(ERL), LDH, Aldolase, ESR, CRP, IgG, complements, ANA, and age at diagnosis. We identified 10 patients with a diagnosis of JDM from January 1st 2020 -July 1st 2021 who were designated as the post-COVID-19 group. This population was compared to a total of 51 patients diagnosed with JDM between Jan 1st 2010 and December 31st 2019 who were designated as the pre-COVID-19 group. Data analysis was performed using Welch T-testing. Research enrollment was impacted due to the COVID-19 pandemic. To better assess JDM rates, chart review and EMR reports were obtained to determine the total number of JDM diagnoses. Results. T-testing showed no significant change in DAS, ERL count, T or B cell flow cytometry, vWF antigen, CK, CMAS, CRP, Aldolase, LDH, IgG, complements or ANA titer between the pre-and post-COVID-19 JDM groups. The analysis showed a significant change in NK cell population with a decrease in the absolute NK cell number (pre 163, post 90.75. P value 0.03), and NK cell percentage (pre 6.6%, post 3.625%, P value 0.008). Both of the patients presented in this case report showed a low NK cell number (1% and 3% respectively). The total number of new JDM cases rose from an average of 6.3 cases per year to an average 9 cases per year from January 1st 2020 to December 31st 2021. Conclusion. This study provides two case reports of COVID-19 likely triggering JDM. This study also shows a modest increase in the number of new JDM cases since the onset of the pandemic. Interestingly, the NK cell population in the post-COVID-19 JDM patients were significantly decreased. NK cells have multiple roles in not only immune regulation, but also the immune response to viruses. This study suggests that NK cells play a role in the development of in virally mediated JDM, specifically in cases triggered by COVID-19. Future studies will be important to further delineate the function of NK cells in these patients. Markers of JDM disease severity, including DAS, Neopterin, CK, and CMAS, did not significantly change in our institution's JDM population after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Early switch from cladribine to alemtuzumab in highly-active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A case report

Background Management of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and evidence of disease activity during treatment with cladribine tablets represents a challenging point. Objectives To report a patient with highly active multiple sclerosis (HAMS) who has been early switched from cladribine to alemtuzumab owing to tumultuous clinical and radiological activity Methods A single retrospective case report. Results. Treatment with alemtuzumab has led to a complete suppression of disease activity without any evidence of infections or acquired autoimmune diseases. Conclusion Our report suggests that an early switch from cladribine to alemtuzumab, may be safe and efficacious in selected HAMS cases.Copyright © 2022 The Authors

COVID-19 Does Not Lead to an Increase in Corticosteroid Prescriptions in IBD Patients: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: It is not known whether coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) is a trigger for disease activity in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). In patients with IBD, we aimed to examine the association between COVID-19 infection and prescriptions of systemic and local corticosteroids (used as proxy for disease activity). METHODS: This nationwide cohort study was based on Danish health registries and included all patients in Denmark with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD) by the start of the pandemic (March 1, 2020) and who had a positive COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test from March 1, 2020, to July 31, 2022. We calculated rates of corticosteroid prescriptions 6 months before and 6 months after a positive COVID-19 PCR test, and we calculated adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRR). RESULTS: We included 30,102 patients with IBD and a positive COVID-19 test (11,159 with CD, 18,493 with UC). The aIRR for having corticosteroid prescriptions after a COVID-19 positive test was 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-0.91). When we stratified for underlying disease, the aIRR for having corticosteroid after a COVID-19 positive test in UC was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.75-0.90), and in CD 0.91 (95% CI, 0.81-1.02). Stratifications according to calendar periods and age groups showed consistent results. CONCLUSIONS: An infection with COVID-19 did not result in a higher rate of filled corticosteroid prescriptions. Using corticosteroids as a proxy for disease activity, COVID-19 did not seem to trigger disease activity, which is a reassuring result for patients with IBD.

An infection with COVID-19 did not result in a higher rate of filled corticosteroid prescriptions. Using corticosteroids as a proxy for disease activity, COVID-19 did not seem to trigger disease activity, which is a reassuring result for patients with IBD.

SARS-CoV-2 pandemic as a model to assess the relationship between intercurrent viral infections and disease activity in Multiple Sclerosis: A propensity score matched case-control study.

INTRODUCTION: An association between intercurrent viral respiratory infections and exacerbations of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) disease activity has been proposed by several studies. Considering the rapid spread of SARS-CoV2 worldwide and the systematic effort to immediately detect all incident cases with specific diagnostic tests, the pandemic can represent an interesting experimental model to assess the relationship between viral respiratory infections and MS disease activity. AIMS AND METHODS: In this study, we have performed a propensity score matched case-control study with a prospective clinical/MRI follow-up, on a cohort of relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV2 in the period 2020-2022, with the aim to evaluate if the SARS-CoV2 infection influences the short-term risk of disease activity. Controls (RRMS patients not exposed to SARS-CoV-2, using 2019 as the reference period) were matched 1:1 with cases for age, EDSS, sex and disease-modifying treatment (DMT) (moderate efficacy vs high efficacy). Differences in relapses, MRI disease activity and confirmed disabilty worsening (CDW) between cases in the 6 months following the SARS-CoV-2 infection, and controls in a similar 6 months reference period in 2019 were compared. RESULTS: We identified 150 cases of SARS-CoV2 infection in the period March 2020 - March 2022, out of a total population of approximately 1500 MS patients, matched with 150 MS patients not exposed to SARS-CoV2 (controls). Mean age was 40.9 ± 12.0 years in cases and 42.0 ± 10.9 years in controls, mean EDSS was 2.54±1.36 in cases and 2.60±1.32 in controls. All patients were treated with a DMT, and a considerable proportion with a high efficacy DMT (65.3% in cases and 66% in controls), reflecting a typical real world RRMS population. 52.8% of patients in this cohort had been vaccinated with a mRNA Covid-19 vaccine. We did not observe a significant difference in relapses (4.0% cases, 5.3% controls; p = 0.774), MRI disease activity (9.3% cases, 8.0% controls; p = 0.838), CDW (5.3% cases, 6.7% controls; p = 0.782) in the 6 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection between cases and controls. CONCLUSION: Using a propensity score matching design and including both clinical and MRI data, this study does not suggest an increased risk of MS disease activity following SARS-CoV-2 infection. All MS patients in this cohort were treated with a DMT, and a considerable number with a high efficacy DMT. These results therefore may not be applicable to untreated patients, for which the risk of increased MS disease activity after SARS-CoV-2 infection may not be excluded. A possible hypothesis explaining these results could be that SARS-CoV2 is less prone, compared to other viruses, to induce exacerbations of MS disease activity; another possible interpretation of these data might be that DMT is able to effectively suppress the increase of disease activity triggered by SARS-CoV2 infection.

Efficacy of risankizumab by baseline clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic disease severity in moderately to severely active Crohn's disease

Background: Risankizumab (RZB), a p19-anti-interleukin-23 monoclonal antibody, has demonstrated efficacy as induction and maintenance therapy in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease (CD). This post hoc analysis evaluates the efficacy of induction and maintenance RZB therapy by baseline clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic disease severity. Method(s): In the ADVANCE (NCT03105128) and MOTIVATE (NCT03104413) studies, patients with moderately to severely active CD and intolerance/inadequate response to >= 1 biologic (both studies) and/or conventional therapy (ADVANCE) were randomized to receive intravenous (IV) RZB induction therapy or placebo (PBO) for 12 weeks. Patients achieving stool frequency and/or abdominal pain score clinical response to 12 weeks of induction therapy were rerandomized in the FORTIFY (NCT03105102) study to receive subcutaneous (SC) maintenance RZB (180 mg or 360 mg) or PBO (withdrawal). Clinical and endoscopic endpoints were evaluated by baseline disease characteristics (Crohn's Disease Activity Index [CDAI: <= 300, > 300], highsensitivity C-reactive protein [hs-CRP: < 10 mg/L, >= 10 mg/L], and Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease [SES-CD: 6-15, > 15]). Induction analyses included patients who received RZB 600 mg or PBO;data from the ADVANCE and MOTIVATE studies were pooled. Nonresponder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 was used. Result(s): The induction analysis included 527 patients who received RZB 600 mg IV and 362 patients who received PBO. Patients treated with RZB 600 mg IV achieved significantly higher response rates vs PBO at week 12, regardless of subgroup (P < .05 for all;Figure 1). In the maintenance study, patients treated with SC RZB continued to achieve higher response rates vs the PBO (withdrawal) group at week 52 regardless of subgroup (P was not < .05 for all;Figure 2). Improvements in clinical and endoscopic outcomes were generally observed from weeks 12 to 52 with RZB treatment across all subgroups. Response rates were generally similar across subgroups in both induction and maintenance studies;endoscopic remission and ulcer-free endoscopy (resolution of ulcer) rates were numerically lower for patients with increased inflammation (hs-CRP > 10 mg/mL) and higher endoscopic activity (SES-CD > 15). Conclusion(s): RZB induction therapy resulted in higher response rates for clinical and endoscopic outcomes compared with PBO at week 12, regardless of baseline clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic disease severity. RZB also showed durable efficacy with continued RZB maintenance therapy, supporting the long-term use of RZB for patients across a range of baseline disease severity and activity.

Switching from intravenous to subcutaneous infliximab: Clinical and patient experience outcomes

Background: Intravenous (IV) infliximab (IFX) monotherapy is associated with significant loss of response. Therapeutic drug monitoring shows an association with low serum trough drug levels and development of anti-IFX antibodies. Combination therapy with immunomodulators is not always possible, and IFX dose escalation leads to higher drug costs and time pressure on infusion units. Both approaches have raised heightened patient safety concerns due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Subcutaneous (SC) IFX pharmacokinetics lead to improved drug trough levels, which could lead to better clinical outcomes. Method(s): The NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde biologics database was used to identify selected patients currently treated with IV IFX for IBD for suitability for SC switch. Patients were contacted to allow informed choice to opt in or out of switch. Baseline clinical data was collected, and patients were reviewed at week 8 and week 24 for assessment of clinical disease activity scores, IFX trough levels/anti-drug antibody levels, and faecal calprotectin. Patient experience outcomes were assessed using a quality of life questionnaire (CUCQ-8). Result(s): 31 patients consented to switch;F:M = 17:14. The majority of patients (16) had Crohn's disease, with 13 with UC and 2 IBDU. Mean duration of disease was 9.1 years and duration of prior IV therapy was 3.3 years. 28 patients were reviewed at week 8 and 24 at week 24. At week 24, 71% of patients were in clinical remission (Harvey-Bradshaw index score <5 or partial Mayo score <2), 96% had CRP <5 mg/Land 87% had FCP <250mug/g. 21% of patients had subtherapeutic IFX trough levels at baseline, all had increased by week 8 and there were no subtherapeutic levels measured by week 24. One patient had detectable antibodies at week 24, compared with 9 patients at baseline. Three patients required oral steroid therapy during the 24-week follow up period. There were no hospital admissions, significant infections or adverse reactions within the cohort. 15 patients submitted CUCQ-8 scores, of these 7 patients' scores had worsened at week 8 but by week 24 13/15 were stable or improved compared to baseline. Conclusion(s): Switching from IV to SC infliximab is welcomed by most patients. The efficacy, tolerability, increased drug level and safety which has previously been demonstrated is reproduced in our cohort. This study is the first to explore patient experience outcomes. The finding of initial worsening of the CUCQ-8 score, but overall improvement by week 24 opens further opportunity for engaging patient involvement in switch programmes.

Facial herpes zoster associated with disease reactivation in a patient with multiple sclerosis under dimethyl fumarate treatment

Background: Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is an approved treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS). Due to its efficacy and safety profile, DMF is the most prescribed oral medication for relapsing remitting (RR) MS. Given the long-term course of treatment with DMF in MS, continuous surveillance of opportunistic infections is fundamental. Case presentation: We report the occurrence of facial herpes zoster (HZ) associated with MS disease reactivation in a person with RRMS after 6 years of DMF therapy. Case report: A 44-year-old woman with RRMS developed right temple pain and blisters over the right cheek, suggestive of facial HZ. A normal lymphocyte count with however relatively lower proportions of CD8+ T cells and higher percentages of natural killer cells were detected in blood. The patient failed oral treatment and required hospitalization for intravenous acyclovir. She eventually developed symptoms of an MS exacerbation featured by lower extremities weakness and urinary retention. Conclusion(s): Our case highlights the importance of counseling patients on the possibility of HZ reactivation even in the setting of a normal lymphocyte count, the risk of MS exacerbation possibly associated with HZ occurrence and the importance of timely vaccination.Copyright © 2022

Effect of upadacitinib on inflammatory markers and clinical outcomes in patients with Crohn's disease in the phase 3, U-EXCEL, U-EXCEED, and U-ENDURE studies

Background: Improvement in clinical outcomes and normalisation of objective markers of inflammation, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and faecal calprotectin (FCP), are considered treatment targets per STRIDE-II guidelines.1 We evaluated the effect of the oral selective Janus kinase inhibitor upadacitinib (UPA) on changes in hs-CRP, FCP, and clinical outcomes in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). Method(s): In 2 phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled induction studies (U-EXCEL, NCT03345849;U-EXCEED, NCT03345836), patients with moderate-to-severe CD received 12-week treatment with UPA 45 mg (UPA45) once daily (QD) or placebo (PBO). Patients with clinical response to UPA45 were rerandomised in U-ENDURE (NCT03345823) to receive 52-week maintenance treatment with UPA 30 mg QD (UPA30), UPA 15 mg QD (UPA15), or PBO. Endpoints included marker normalisation (hs-CRP <= 5 mg/L, FCP <= 250 mug/g) in patients with elevated baseline marker levels, normal marker and clinical remission by Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI < 150) or very soft/liquid stool frequency (SF)/abdominal pain score (APS) (average daily SF <= 2.8 and average daily APS <= 1, neither greater than baseline), and >= 50% reduction from baseline in marker values with a decrease of at least 100 points in CDAI from baseline. Median changes from baseline in marker levels were also evaluated. Non-responder imputation with no special data handling for missing data due to COVID-19 was used. Result(s): Of 1021 enrolled patients, 645 (63.2%) had elevated hs-CRP (> 5 mg/L) and 750 (73.5%) had elevated FCP (> 250 mug/g) levels at baseline. Significantly greater proportions of patients with elevated baseline marker levels achieved normalisation with UPA compared with PBO at week 12 (Fig 1A/B) and week 52 (Fig 2A/B;nominal P < .001 for all). Decreases in marker levels from baseline with UPA were observed as early as week 2 and were significantly greater than with PBO through week 12 (Fig 1C) and week 52 (Fig 2C;nominal P < .001 for all). Patients achieved clinical endpoints and improvements in markers at significantly higher rates with UPA45 vs PBO at week 12 (Fig 1D-F) and with UPA15 and UPA30 vs PBO at week 52 (Fig 2D-F;P < .001 for all). The safety profile of UPA in CD was previously reported and no new safety concerns were identified. Conclusion(s): Improvements in clinical endpoints and normalisation of objective markers of inflammation were achieved as early as week 2 with UPA45 induction and sustained with UPA15 and UPA30 maintenance therapy in patients with CD. Median changes in hs-CRP and FCP with UPA support continued improvement of inflammation up to week 52 .